Fun_People Archive
10 May
Explanation of Copywrite [sic]

Content-Type: text/plain
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
From: Peter Langston <psl>
Date: Mon, 10 May 99 14:50:09 -0700
To: Fun_People
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Explanation of Copywrite [sic]

X-Lib-of-Cong-ISSN: 1098-7649
X-http://www.langston.com/psl-bin/Fun_People.cgi
Forwarded-by: Will Payne <wgp@tele2.co.uk>


When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write,
if the copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right
your copy. If you write religious services you write rite, and have the
right to copyright the rite you write.

Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to
copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write
right rite, and has the right to copyright the right rite he has the
right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy
right before the copyright can be right.

Should Jim Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write
right rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that
rite would copy Wright right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright
would have the right to right.

© 1999 Peter Langston