Fun_People Archive
5 Feb
Ex-cons vs. MBAs

Content-Type: text/plain
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
From: Peter Langston <psl>
Date: Fri,  5 Feb 99 11:54:33 -0800
To: Fun_People
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Ex-cons vs. MBAs

X-Lib-of-Cong-ISSN: 1098-7649
Forwarded-by: Nev Dull <nev@bostic.com>
Forwarded-by: "Michael Kass" <kass@pixar.com>

Ball State University
15-Jan-99

    Ex-Convicts, MBA Grads Have Similar Ethical Standards

MUNCIE, Ind. -- When it comes to ethical standards, convicts and MBA
students rate about even, says a Ball State University researcher.

A survey of a group of convicts found their ethical standards compare
favorably to those of MBA students. But, when it comes to loyalty, convicted
felons may have the edge, said Shaheen Borna, a marketing professor.

A survey found that inmates were more loyal to their employers, placed
higher priority on customer service and worked better in groups.

The survey's participants were from three minimum security prisons located
in three Midwestern states. Participants were mostly male (90 percent),
white (80 percent), and young (48 percent were between 20-25 and 32 percent
between 25-30).  The average sentence served by respondents was 4.5 years.

All respondents were convicted felons participating in some capacity in the
prison education system. None were a Ball State student.

The survey found:

About 73 percent of MBA students and 60 percent of convicts would hire, if
it was legal, a competitor's employees who knew the details of a profitable
discovery.

Both groups believe their own ethical standards are about the same as or
superior to peers, past supervisors and business executives.

When it came to priorities, convicts put customers first while students
favored stockholders and customers second.

Inmates were more "loyal" than their student counterparts. Convicts were
more likely to do what was asked of them in ethically difficult or ethically
doubtful situations.

Students were more likely to quit when faced with obviously unethical
behavior while inmates were more likely to leave when the behavior involved
a deal with the government.

Inmates placed greater importance on group trust and loyality.

"With respect to priorities, little difference was found between the two
groups," Borna said. "The differences that were found in response to
questions had to do with inmates' loyalty or with inmates' high priority
for customers -- hardly undesirable characteristics for a potential
employee."

Despite public perception, inmates in the prison education system, many
convicts have the potential to become productive members of society if
business executives are willing to provide opportunities, he said.

"If a potential employer believes that the values and ethics of inmates in
the prison education system are not that different from the values and
ethics of students in graduate higher education, that manager might be much
more willing to take a chance on an ex-con," Borna said.

The research provides some evidence that organizations are missing out on
the dual opportunity to lessen the correctional burden on society and add
a valuable and loyal source of productivity, he said.

The survey also emphasizes that university faculty should increase awareness
of ethics in business decisions by having students participate in live
situations instead of learn them from books or lectures.

"Most groups, including convicted felons, know ethics and will usually do
the right thing," Borna said. "The key issue in education may be getting
students to recognize that most decisions have a moral dimension."

(NOTE TO EDITORS: For more information, contact Borna at sborna@bsu.edu or
at (765) 285-5191. For more stories visit the Ball State University News
Center at newscenter.bsu.edu on the World Wide Web.)

© 1999 Peter Langston