Fun_People Archive
30 Mar
The Journal of Irreproducible Results Takes a Stand on Abortion
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 02:01:26 PST
To: Fun_People
Subject: The Journal of Irreproducible Results Takes a Stand on Abortion
[This is just one of the carefully researched and presented articles in the
April issue of the mini-Journal of Irreproducible Results <jir@MIT.EDU>.
Fortunately, recent changes in the mini-JIR copyright notice have made some
forms of excerpting legal (thank you, Marc). -psl]
Subject: Apr '94 issue of mini-JIR -- please refrigerate promptly
============================================================
The mini-Journal of Irreproducible Results ("mini-JIR")
ISSN 1072-7159
------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Electronic mini-Organ of
The Society for Basic Irreproducible Research
------------------------------------------------------------
Produced jointly by
The Journal of Irreproducible Results (JIR) and
The MIT Museum
============================================================
1994-04-04 Our Stand on Abortion
Where We Stand
With recent advancements in medicine and biology it is now possible to
push back the time of a safe abortion. Because of this, and its impact
on society, it is important that scientists take a stand on exactly how
late an abortion should allowed. We propose 18 years.
We also commissioned a public opinion survey,
the results of which are presented here:
* * *
The Abortion Controversy
A Public Opinion Survey
by Aaron K. Lish, Ph.D.
The Institute for Public Acknowledgment
Background
We undertook a definitive survey of American public opinion about the
abortion controversy. Previous attempts to measure the public's views
about abortion have all been flawed or otherwise inadequate. In the
United States, abortion has become an increasingly divisive issue. An
accurate assessment of public opinion could have profound effects on the
country's political and moral climate.
The Survey Question
We surveyed 41,000 adults. The survey consisted of one question:
Do you support the abortion controversy? (yes or no)
Results of the Survey
We tabulated the responses according to criteria of gender, age,
religious affiliation, and political affiliation.
[A detailed graphical interpretation of the data appears in section
1994-04-12 below.]
Male:
13% YES
76% NO
11% UNDECIDED
Female:
76% YES
13% NO
11% UNDECIDED
Ages 18-50:
59% YES
32% NO
9% UNDECIDED
[Note: In order to conform with recent Supreme Court interpretations of
U. S. laws, we have destroyed all data for the age group 51-64.]
Ages 65 and above:
23% YES
21% NO
56% UNDECIDED
Protestant:
83% YES
12% NO
5% UNDECIDED
Catholic:
12% YES
83% NO
5% UNDECIDED
Jewish and/or Moslem
43% YES
42% NO
5% UNDECIDED
Other religeous affiliation, no religious affiliation,
or illegible:
3% YES
3% NO
94% UNDECIDED
Republicans:
32% YES
62% NO
4% UNDECIDED
Democrats:
62% YES
32% NO
4% UNDECIDED
Independents:
33% YES
33% NO
34% UNDECIDED
Libertarians:
98%YES
2% NO
0% UNDECIDED
Analysis and Conclusion
The American public is deeply divided on the abortion controversy.
---------------------------
1994-04-11 Yes, please DO make copies! (*)
You have permission to send copies of mini-JIR, or excerpts from it, to
anyone who might be interested. The only limitations are:
A) Please include this section, or in some other way clearly indicate
that the material appeared in mini-JIR and is reprinted with permission.
B) You do NOT have permission to copy this document for commercial
purposes.
The contents of this document are copyright (c) 1994, Marc Abrahams.
For subscription information, send e-mail to: jir@mit.edu
----------------
The mini-Journal of Irreproducible Results ("mini-JIR")
Editor: Marc Abrahams (jir@mit.edu)
Technical Brains: Marilyn Geller (mgeller@mit.edu)
Associate Editors: Mark Dionne, Stanley Eigen, Jane Patrick
--------------------------------------------------------------------
© 1994 Peter Langston