Fun_People Archive
6 Mar
An ugliness of the times...
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 14:51:40 PST
To: Fun_People
Subject: An ugliness of the times...
[This looks like more growing pains on the horizon of the information
super-town-hall... (Ouch! Somebody block that metaphor!) So who's really
responsible for what gets posted where? What happens when someone else gets an
account in your name? Is caveat emptor the only way? On the internet no one
may know you're a dog, but lots of people may know that your account info says
you work for Wonder Dogs Inc. and report directly to Rin Tin Tin... -psl]
Forwarded-by: rex@wonder.dogs.com
Subject: Richard Milhous Gates?
This is *not for attribution* (though it may be public elsewhere).
Rex
------- Forwarded Message
Microsoft and Dirty Tricks?
03/02/94
Message from: PHILLIP S. WILSON
Personal Systems Marketing Specialist (pswilso@vnet.ibm.com)
US Marketing and Services T/L 749-0884
The following is a copy of a letter sent to the Microsoft Board
of Directors. This letter is from William Zachmann regarding
an incident on the online Compuserve forum Canopus, and it makes for
good reading. This is being sent out with the full permission of
William Zachmann.
Phillip
*********************************************************************
Members of the Board of Directors
Microsoft Corporation
Redmond, Washington
Sirs:
On January 25, 1994 someone using the name "Steve
Barkto" used CompuServe account 73754,1122 to post a number
of messages on the Canopus Research Forum, purporting to be
an IBM customer ("we spent 7 figures last year with IBM, we
can complain") and implying that he was from Oklahoma City
(OKC). He made critical and derogatory statements about IBM
and about specific individuals who are IBM employees.
Copies of the messages posted by "Barkto" are attached.
I have subsequently learned, however, from what I
believe to be extremely reliable sources, that the account
used by "Barkto" is in fact a Microsoft account 'owned'
individually by Rick Segal. Segal is an employee of
Microsoft working in the Developer Relations Group (DRG)
which group reports to Microsoft Vice President of Systems
Strategy Jonathan Lazarus. Segal has also been an active
participant on the Canopus Research Forum on CompuServe.
That the account used by "Barkto" was in fact a
Microsoft account 'owned' personally by Rick Segal can
readily be verified by simple reference to Microsoft's own
records as well as by reference to the CompuServe member
records concerning the 73754,1122 account. Both are readily
available to the Microsoft Corporation and therefore to you
as members of the Board of Directors of the Microsoft
Corporation.
At best, whoever perpetrated the "Barkto" postings
using that Microsoft account 'owned' by Microsoft employee
Rick Segal has engaged in a stupid, immature, childish,
irresponsible and inexcusable prank. On that account,
alone, there is no question that it is your obligation to
Microsoft, Microsoft shareholders, Microsoft employees,
Microsoft customers, to the public, to CompuServe, to the
participants of the Canopus Research Forum, to members of
the on-line community generally and to me as the sponsor of
the Canopus Research Forum as well, thoroughly and
completely to investigate who has used a Microsoft account
'owned' by a Microsoft employee to do such a thing, to see
to it that any and all Microsoft employees who may have been
in any way involved in the perpetration of such an act are
dismissed, whoever they may be and whatever their position
is at the Microsoft Corporation, to issue a public apology
to all concerned, and to see to it that policies are
promptly put in place to ensure that no such thing ever
happens again.
At worst, however, the "Barkto" affair may be merely
the tip of a much larger and far more serious iceberg.
There have been persistent rumors and claims throughout the
industry of a deliberate and intentional "dirty tricks"
campaign by Microsoft to spread disinformation about
Microsoft competitors and to discredit critics of the
Microsoft Corporation. The office of Microsoft Vice
President of Systems Strategy, Jonathan Lazarus and the
operations reporting to him have repeatedly been the focus
of such rumors.
These rumors include claims that Microsoft has engaged
in a systematic practice of having employees of Microsoft as
well as independent agents of Microsoft log onto on-line
services such as CompuServe, Prodigy, American On-line, the
Internet and others, sometimes under assumed names, to
spread disinformation about Microsoft's competitors and to
discredit critics of the Microsoft Corporation. They have
also included claims of deliberate efforts by Microsoft
improperly to influence the editorial content of various
publications and to silence critics of Microsoft in the
press.
The "Barkto" incident, perpetrated by someone using a
Microsoft account 'owned' by a Microsoft employee in a group
reporting to Microsoft Vice President of Systems Strategy
Jonathan Lazarus lends credibility to these rumors. While
it certainly does not provide the basis for any reliable
conclusion on the matter, it certainly does raise the
possibility that "Barkto" was part of a much broader and, I
should say, potentially much more sinister pattern of
activity. Further grounds for concern on this point are to
be found in admissions made publicly by Rick Segal.
An IBM employee, Dave Whittle, had been in private
correspondence with Segal by electronic mail and private
messages as well as through phone conversations. In a
public message (#113984) posted on the Canopus Research
Forum on CompuServe on February 11, 1994 at 6:15:14 EST
Whittle, using his account 76711,1061 said (among other
things): "Rick told me over a year ago when we were being
open with each other that he had heard of instances where
Steve Ballmer and other MS execs would use phony PPNs and
names to have some fun on the forums."
Segal, using his regular account (76276,2706) at
8:09:40 P.M. EST (5:09:40 PST) did not deny that in a
message (#114109) on the Canopus Research Forum and
responded as follows: "Senior Execs have PPNs so they can
go onto compuserve <sic>, go onto forums, enjoy a debate,
have some fun, etc. They are smart enough not to use real
names so they don't have to put up with crap like this. I
told you this. If you have a problem with it, I don't
care."
I therefore publicly call upon you, as members of the
Board of Directors of the Microsoft Corporation, in exercise
of your solemn fiduciary and other responsibilities,
promptly to engage a reputable, independent, outside
investigative agency; to give that agency full access to all
relevant Microsoft records (including CompuServe records
concerning accounts belonging to the Microsoft Corporation
or to Microsoft employees); to require all Microsoft
employees, regardless of position or status fully and
truthfully to cooperate with that agency; and to charge that
agency not only with the task of identifying the
perpetrators of the "Barkto" affair, but also to investigate
thoroughly the possibility that behind it there may have
been a deliberate "dirty tricks" campaign waged by Microsoft
under the direction of employees of the Microsoft
Corporation.
I also call upon you to pledge to make known publicly
the results of that investigation and further to pledge that
any and all employees of the Microsoft Corporation who may
have been involved in any way in the perpetration of or in
covering up the "Barkto" incident and any possible, broader
"dirty tricks" campaign will be required to resign and to
proffer a public apology to all offended parties.
One very simple procedure that the investigative agency
you hire can follow will be to compare the list of
CompuServe and other on-line services' accounts paid for or
sponsored by the Microsoft Corporation (which lists will be
readily available both internally to Microsoft and through
the various on-line services own records of Microsoft
accounts which will surely be available to you) against the
names and postings of individuals who, by their behavior,
look like they might have been involved in a possible
Microsoft "dirty tricks" disinformation campaign against
competitors and critics.
I will be happy to provide you with a list of names of
such individuals and the CompuServe account numbers ("PPNs")
used by them based upon my own observations there. I am
quite sure many others in the on-line community will be
willing to do the same, not only for CompuServe, but for
Prodigy, American On-line, the Internet and other on-line
services and facilities as well.
A number of individuals have long been suspected of
being deliberate agents of a possible Microsoft "dirty
tricks" campaign. By a thorough and complete examination of
Microsoft's own records and those of the various on-line
services and networks involved, it will be readily
determined whether any such individuals have used accounts
belonging to or paid for or sponsored by the Microsoft
Corporation.
Beyond that, the investigative agency you hire should
also check Microsoft records and interview Microsoft
employees to determine what, if any, business arrangements
Microsoft may have had and what, if any, payments Microsoft
has made to or for the benefit of any of the individuals
who, by their behavior on one or another of the public on-
line information services, appears to be a possible agent of
a possible Microsoft "dirty tricks" campaign.
Of course, all this could also be done under subpoena
by any government agency with an interest in possible
illegal practices on the part of the Microsoft Corporation
or by any third party that might undertake (or have ongoing)
legal action against the Microsoft Corporation to which such
a possible "dirty tricks" campaign might be relevant. I
urge you, however, to consider seriously both your legal
obligations and responsibilities as members of the Microsoft
Board of Directors and also your ethical and moral
responsibilities and to act promptly to launch an
investigation on your own initiative on behalf of your
shareholders and others potentially affected by these
matters.
Yours truly,
William F. Zachmann
Canopus Research
------- End of Forwarded Message
© 1994 Peter Langston